Addressing hepatitis delta in primary care practices in the US: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: Infection with the hepatitis delta virus (HDV), a unique RNA virus that requires hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigens for its assembly, replication, and transmission, causes severe viral hepatitis. Compared to HBV monoinfection, HDV infection increases the risk of severe liver disease, necessity for liver transplant, and mortality. Global HDV prevalence estimates vary from 5% to 15% among persons with HBV, but screening guidelines for HDV are inconsistent; some recommend risk-based screening, while others recommend universal screening for all people with HBV. Among primary care providers (PCPs) in the US, there is a lack of awareness and/or insufficient adherence to current recommendations for the screening of HDV infection and management of chronic HDV. METHODS: Publications were obtained by conducting literature searches between July and August 2022 using the PubMed database and by manual searches of the retrieved literature for additional references. Information was synthesized to highlight HDV screening and management strategies for PCPs. Best practices for PCPs based on current guidelines and comanagement strategies for patients with HBV and HDV infection were summarized. RESULTS: We recommend universal screening for HDV in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. Confirmed HDV infection should prompt evaluation by a liver specialist, if available, with whom the PCP can comanage the patient. PCPs should counsel patients on the expected course of the disease, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, need for consistent disease monitoring and follow-up, and risk of disease transmission. Screening is suggested for sexual partners, household contacts, and family members, with HBV immunization recommended for those found to be susceptible. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for HDV infection; thus, management is limited to treatments for chronic HBV infection plus long-term monitoring of liver health. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs can be a valuable point of care for patients to access HDV/HBV screening, HBV immunization, and education, and can comanage patients with HBV and/or HDV infection.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection only occurs in the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. People with an HDV infection are at higher risk for severe liver disease, liver transplant, and death compared to those who only have an HBV infection. The estimated global prevalence of HDV infection ranges from 5% to 15% among people living with HBV. These measurements vary due to different study methods, inconsistent HDV screening guidelines, and patient risk factors for infection.In the US, primary care providers (PCPs) play an important role in improving community access to HDV information and testing. However, poor funding and inadequate resources have created a lack of awareness and insufficient adherence by PCPs to current recommendations for screening and management of HDV infection. This narrative review aims to fill this gap by providing an overview of HDV infection, patient risk factors, and practice guidelines for PCPs.The recommendations for PCPs in this review include providing universal screening for HDV to people with an HBV infection, especially those at high risk. PCPs can educate and comanage patients with liver specialists. Topics to discuss with patients include expected disease outcomes, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, and the need for consistent follow-up appointments. Patient risk of disease transmission can also be discussed to identify sexual partners, household contacts, and family members who will need screening and HBV vaccination. While there are no FDA-approved therapies for treating HDV infection, we provide an overview of available and emerging HDV treatments.

Ranking of cities according to public health criteria: pitfalls and opportunities.

Popular magazines often rank cities in terms of various aspects of quality of life. Such ranking studies can motivate people to visit or relocate to a particular city or increase the frequency with which they engage in healthy behaviors. With careful consideration of study design and data limitations, these efforts also can assist policymakers in identifying local public health issues. We discuss considerations in interpreting ranking studies that use environmental measures of a city population's public health related to physical activity, nutrition, and obesity. Ranking studies such as those commonly publicized are constrained by statistical methodology issues and a lack of a scientific basis in regard to design.